The implementation of a “generally recognized as safe” (GRAS) notification
process for animal feed ingredients has been eagerly awaited for years. It is
not surprising, then, that the announcement by the US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) Center for Veterinary Medicine (CVM) of its intent to
start accepting notifications this past summer was met with great enthusiasm by
the petfood industry.
However, many in the industry are confused as to how to take
advantage of this process. I have been told by outside parties that the
notifications submitted to FDA to date have not been of suitable quality to effectively
evaluate the safety of the substance in question.
To help address this problem, Cantox Health Sciences International
recently held a workshop entitled “How to utilize the ‘new’ GRAS process for
animal food ingredients.” I was honored to be invited to speak at a workshop along
with Cantox employees and a representative from the Association of American
Feed Control Officials (AAFCO). While the audience was relatively small, the
attendees were very enthusiastic and not at all shy in asking questions.
The “new” process is not really that new. In fact, FDA first proposed the GRAS
notification process to replace the GRAS affirmation process over a decade ago. Although the regulations proposed in 1997 have yet to be
finalized, the center within FDA responsible for human food safety evaluation
has been accepting GRAS notifications for many years. However, it was only a
few months ago when CVM started doing the same for animal feed
Legally, a company has had the ability to conduct a self-determination
of GRAS without submission to FDA since enactment of the Food Additives
Amendment Act of 1958. However, the newly implemented notification process, wherein
a summary of the data considered in the GRAS determination is voluntarily submitted
to FDA, has distinct advantages.
While FDA review of the submission does not constitute formal
approval by the agency, it does offer some reassurance to the company that its
determination of GRAS was not without basis. Also, by public acknowledgement
that a reviewed substance raised “no questions” with FDA, there is a means by
which consumers and state regulators can verify that the data to support safe use
have been evaluated by someone other than the company itself.
The first step in GRAS notification is to compile a dossier of all
available information on the substance. To be generally recognized as safe, the bulk of information—and
particularly, all of the pivotal data to support safe use—must be in the public
domain (e.g., published in peer-reviewed scientific journals). Components of a
dossier may include:
An unbiased expert panel must then review the dossier. A minimum
of three panelists should vary in expertise so all aspects are covered. For
example, a veterinary nutritionist, a veterinary toxicologist and a scientific
authority on the substance in question may be a good complement of expertise
for evaluating many petfood ingredients.
The panel discusses the dossier and may ask for more information
or investigate further on its own. The panel must reach a consensus that there
is reasonable certainty of no harm under the intended conditions of use before
a determination of GRAS may be reached. Only then may the sponsor submit the
GRAS notification to FDA.
AAFCO definitions rely on “enforcement discretion,” not a formal
approval or notification process. Concern has been raised about having so many feed
ingredients exist in this regulatory limbo. Thus, with implementation of the
GRAS notification process, FDA has indicated its desire to phase out the AAFCO
definition process, possibly by the time the FDA/AAFCO Memorandum of Understanding expires in 2012.
In fact, there is discussion that many of the existing AAFCO definitions
(especially those established after 1958) will eventually need to be reexamined,
and some ingredients may be deleted if safe use cannot be resubstantiated.
FDA intends to post GRAS notifications and the agency’s responses
on its website. It is hoped that AAFCO will include in its Official Publication a list of those substances to which FDA had
“no questions.” The listing of GRAS notifications through this venue would be
of great service to state feed control officials, the petfood industry,
consumers and others who may use this resource for determining acceptability of
Federal Register Notice on GRAS Notification Proposed Rule (April
Federal Register Notice on GRAS Notification Pilot Program for Animal Feed Ingredients (June 4, 2010)
FDA “Letter to Industry” (October
to submit a GRAS Notification
Health Sciences International—Services re: GRAS Notifications
The question is whether they provide additional benefit to the dog or cat
It's the finishing touch that can meet both owner and pet needs.
It's an "Intel inside" type of molecule -- but also a problem child
Committees discussed key proposals such as a possible shift in the oversight of animal feeds
The intent was to educate regulators and industry about the Model Pet Food Regulations
It gives more direct control to CVM in establishing and maintaining ingredient definitions
Public meetings invited comments and provided updates
The mid-year meeting addressed several regulatory matters affecting petfoods
--- Thank you for your patience ----
If you have any issues logging in or any other need feel free to contact us.