Recent Issues I Newsletters I Petfood Forum I Subscribe to Magazine
  Sign In I  Sign Up
PetfoodIndustry.com

  • HOME
  • MARKET INFORMATION
  • NUTRITION
  • SAFETY
  • PRODUCTION
  • PACKAGING
  • TOP PETFOOD COMPANIES
  • News
  • Products
  • Petfood and Treats
  • Petfood-Connection.com
  • Industry Calendar
  • Buyer's Guide

  • News
      • Email this to a friend Email
      • Print Printer
        Friendly
      • Font size: Decrease Font Increase Font
      • Share:Share
      • Share:Share Close
        • FacebookFacebook
        • MySpaceMySpace
        • stumbleuponstumbleupon
        • deliciousdelicious
        • diggdigg
        • newsvinenewsvine
        • linkedinlinkedin

      PIJAC urges California, USA, to vote down petfood labeling proposal

      Proposal on November 2012 ballots would no longer processed petfoods to be labeled as "natural," Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council says.

      Release Date: Comments(0)

      In the elections on November 6, residents in California, USA, will have the chance to vote on a proposal that could impact petfood labeling requirements in that state. 

      Proposition 37 is a labeling initiative aimed at providing consumers with information about "genetically engineered food," including petfood. The proposal would no longer allow any processed foods to be labeled as "natural," and retailers would be responsible for ensuring all processed foods containing any covered any covered material are identified as “Partially Produced with Genetic Engineering” or “May be Partially Produced with Genetic Engineering.” For any product not so labeled, the proposal would require “a retailer generally must be able to document why that product is exempt from labeling.”

      According to the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council: "Not only does the proposal mandate far-reaching labeling requirements, it allows lawsuits by private parties to enforce the provisions, authorizing courts to award all costs incurred in investigating and prosecuting the action. Additionally, consumers could sue for violations under the state Consumer Legal Remedies Act, meaning consumers need not even demonstrate any injury to recover damages."

      The Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council also says that processed foods, such as foods that have been canned, smoked, pressed, cooked, frozen, dehydrated, fermented or milled could no longer be labeled as natural. The group says the California Attorney General’s official summary states that “these restrictions [could] be interpreted by the courts to apply to [such processed foods] regardless of whether they are genetically engineered.”

      If adopted, the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council says Proposition 37 would impose significant costs on California consumers, including pet owners, and would not be able to be changed if it is adopted because it is a ballot initiative. The group urges California pet owners and consumers to vote down Proposition 37. Those with questions about the proposal may contact Michael Maddox, of the Pet Industry Joint Advisory Council, by calling +1.202.452.1525, ext. 106, or emailing Michael@pijac.org.



      1
      1
      1

      Related Content

      Previous
      Next
      • pet food labeling

      • pet food industry

      GoodGuide: Science Diet number one in petfood brands

      1,500 products, 50 brands rated in survey

      AAFCO committee passes calorie proposal

      During the annual meeting, the Pet Food Committee approved recommendations to require calorie content statements on all dog and cat food labels

      More news from AAFCO

      At its annual meeting, AAFCO addressed ingredient definitions, petfood safety matters and certified organic petfoods

      More content about pet food labeling

      AAFCO news, part 2

      Committees discussed key proposals such as a possible shift in the oversight of animal feeds

      FDA discusses petfood labeling and safety

      Public meetings invited comments and provided updates

      AAFCO moves toward calorie statements

      The mid-year meeting addressed several regulatory matters affecting petfoods

      More content about pet food industry
       

      Comments

      0 Comments

      Add Comment

      Text Only 2000 character limit
  •  
  • Create or Maintain an account

    • Sign Up
    • Edit Your Profile
    • Subscribe to Newsletters
    • RSS feeds
    • Why Register

    Custom Publications

    • Empyreal 75 Update
    • The Extru-Technician

    Digital Editions

    • Petfood Industry
  • Events

    • Petfood Forum
    • Petfood Workshop
    • Petfood Forum China
    • Petfood Forum Asia
    • Petfood Forum Europe
    • Webinars
  • Help and Information Center

    • Support
    • Petfood Industry Editorial Staff
    • Advertising Contacts
    • Media Guide
    • Article Reprints

    Newsletters

    • Petfood Industry e-News
    • Petfood Industry Nutrition News

    Digital Directories

    • Petfood Industry Reference and Buyer's Guide
  • Social Media

    • Petfood-Connection
    • Petfood-Connection Smart Phone App
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • YouTube

    Nutrition Courses

    • WATT eLearning
    • Customized Training

    WATT Corporate

    • About WATT
    • Corporate Contacts
  • © Watt Publishing Co., 2013 All Rights Reserved
  • |Sitemap

--- Thank you for your patience ----

If you have any issues logging in or any other need feel free to contact us.

loading