Tuesday, December 16 , 2014
The Council for Agricultural Science and Technology issue paper 54, "The Potential Impacts of Mandatory Labeling for Genetically Engineered Food in the United States," examines arguments for and
against the mandatory labeling of genetically engineered (GE) foods, the costs involved with labeling and experiences in countries
that use mandatory labeling. Led by Task Force Chair Dr. Alison Van Eenennaam,
the authors gather factual information to produce a peer-reviewed publication
that clarifies the potential impacts of mandatory labeling.
of mandatory GE labeling cite the right to know what is in their food as an
important attribute of a democratic society. Opponents think that such a label
will increase the cost of food and confuse consumers with no corresponding
improvement in human health or food safety. Seemingly contradictory studies are
cited to support opposing views—informed discourse about this emotional issue
is hard to find. This paper looks at key aspects of the argument including the
The paper's authors finish with conclusions they pulled from their science-based research. They also call for better communication about this issue, and recommend that legislators and consumers should be provided with independent objective information to help move the national discussion from contentious claims to a more fact-based, informed debate.
--- Thank you for your patience ----
If you have any issues logging in or any other need feel free to contact us.