Part one of a series based on this question: Is petfood about marketing or nutrition?
Imagine this conversation between Joe Zweifel (chairman of the board) and Justin Case (marketing director) at the HQ of FYP Inc. (Feed Your Pet):
Joe: It’s about time we bring something new to the market, more than our current run-of-the-mill products.
Justin: Excellent idea. How about natural products?
Joe: That is very old hat; I do remember that when I started in petfood, this was already mainstream.
Justin: Organic could be an option.
Joe: Why not? But I fear we run into problems with raw material supplies.
Justin: Could very well be; so why don’t we opt for holistic, to be on the safe side?
Joe: Oh no! Besides the fact that nobody knows what it is, this denomination is by now used by virtually every manufacturer in the industry.
Justin: True, but it seems powerful. By the way, something that is not used by anybody in the industry is symbiotic.
Joe: That has a nice ring. What does it mean?
Justin: Dunno. But I will look it up straightaway.
Joe: So symbiotic is the adjective that describes an interaction between two different organisms living in close association, usually to the advantage of both. Sounds complicated.
Justin: Yes, great, isn’t it? Mystery sells.
Joe: So, what do you plan to do?
Justin: I want to turn this into a major program. Our major launch of the decade. Think of what we can do: register Symbiosis as a global trademark, develop a dry and a wet line, approach the symbiots if they exist.
Joe: This can stand out. A new denomination protected through the trademark. Monopoly in this new segment. What are the consequences product-wise?
Justin: Hardly any, because we do not want to rock the boat. Do we?
To be continued …
21st Pet Street, home of Change Stranamics